£20,000 compensation for engineer with cold injuries


The claimant developed injuries as a result as a result of prolonged exposure to cold temperatures whilst working for the defendants as a Maintenance Engineer. Over a two year period the claimant was exposed to extremely low temperatures of -20 degrees to - 70. This was whilst working in a large freezer complex.

See also:

Cold injury compensation claim

Nottingham personal injury solicitors

Read other case studies:

Case details

The continued exposure to low temperatures caused severe cold injury symptoms in the claimant's feet and hands. After 2 years the claimant's health began suffer. The claimant had to stop working.

Injuries and Progression

The cold conditions had caused circulatory problems as well nerve damage. The claimant had on going pain which did not diminish. He also suffered with dermatitis and constant headaches. He had bouts of sweating. He had become irritable.


Liability for the claimant's condition was not in dispute but the defendants suggested the claimant was exaggerating his symptoms.

Medical Evidence

Medical evidence was obtained in support of the claimant's claim. This confirmed the on going symptoms to the hands and feet even though the claimant was no longer working in the freezer. The medical expert recommended that the claimant work on an indoor job to limit the effects of his symptoms. Joint problems in the future were to be anticipated particularly in the ankles.


The claimant and defendants solicitors tried to enter into meaningful discussions with a view to settling the claimant's claim. However it became apparent that the parties were some distance apart in their valuations of the claimant's claim. As no agreement could be reached the claimant instructed his solicitors to issue county court proceedings.

Court Award

The claimant's claim was heard in Nottingham by a Judge 4 years later. The Judge found the claimant to be a reliable witness and believed the devastating effects the claimant's symptoms had on his lifestyle. The Judge awarded the claimant £20,000 for his pain suffering and loss of amenity.

There was additional award to the claimant for being at a disadvantage on the open labour market of £7,000. This additional type of award was first established in the case of Smith-v-Manchester Corporation

Read more: work accident compensation claims

How can Quittance help?

The panel of work accident solicitors have over 25 years experience helping injured people make work accident claims.

  • Tick icon 100% No Win, No Fee
  • Tick icon FREE consultation
  • Tick icon No Obligation to start a claim

Call us to find out how much compensation you could claim, or to ask us anything about the No Win No Fee claims process. We are open 8am to 9pm weekdays, 9am to 6pm on Saturday, and 9.30am to 5pm on Sunday.

Call us FREE 0800 612 7456 or arrange a callback:

Call me back
Review testimonial image
Quittance testimonial quotation marks

Handled with the utmost professionalism... extremely kind, courteous and empathetic.

The Good Solicitor Guide

Gaynor Haliday, Legal researcher

Gaynor Haliday, Legal researcher